Glossary entry (derived from question below)
français term or phrase:
champs de plusieurs bases
anglais translation:
fields in multiple databases
français term
champs de plusieurs bases
Par ailleurs, le développement de nouveaux «visualiseurs» opérant sur des images 16 bit permet d'afficher et de superposer des images multispectrales pour examiner leur différence par variation d'opacité. Ces nouveaux outils sont utilisés pour la recherche et la restauration des œuvres d'art.
4 +4 | fields in multiple databases | Rob Grayson |
Non-PRO (1): Irene McClure
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
fields in multiple databases
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 mins (2008-04-04 07:40:07 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Just re-reading your source text - of course, I should have said "one or more fields in multiple databases".
Something went wrong...