| Stran v tématu: [1 2] > | Poll: Do you think your customers would pay you extra if you outsourced proofreading of your translations? Autor vlákna: ProZ.com Staff
|
|---|
This forum topic is for the discussion of the poll question "Do you think your customers would pay you extra if you outsourced proofreading of your translations?".
This poll was originally submitted by Julian Holmes. View the poll results »
| | | | | Depends on what you mean by proofreading | Nov 17, 2016 |
Rereading my own translation, making sure there are no spelling errors or typos, is included in my rate. I can't imagine this not being included in a professional translation.
If proofreading means checking of the same by a second pair of eyes and possibly some terminological checking, as well, then yes, I have clients who pay extra for this second opinion. Very few clients draw a distinction between proofreading and editing, btw.
| | | | Julian Holmes 
Japonsko
Local time: 03:45
Člen (2011)
japonština -> angličtina
For the life of me, I cannot remember ever having submitted this poll. I am really royally befuddled. 
And, I'm positive this will lead to the perennial "What is 'proofreading/reviewing/checking/editing'?" debate.
I think polls should be run within earshot of when they were submitted instead of ageing in the vaults. Time for a beer already, methinks.
| | | |
for most of them, because they already have proofreaders/editors/revisers in place, which I find quite reassuring.
However, I have one or two domestic (Danish) agencies, who offer a higher rate if I take care of external proofreading.
| | |
|
|
|
neilmac
Španělsko
Local time: 20:45
španělština -> angličtina
+ ...
N/A (Not Applicable).
My clients send me their stuff and all they're worried about is getting it back suitably good-to-go. It could be checked and remedied by Sooty and his magic wand for all they know...
Izzy-wizzy...
Cultural note:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sooty
[Edited at 2016-11-17 09:23 ... See more N/A (Not Applicable).
My clients send me their stuff and all they're worried about is getting it back suitably good-to-go. It could be checked and remedied by Sooty and his magic wand for all they know...
Izzy-wizzy...
Cultural note:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sooty
[Edited at 2016-11-17 09:23 GMT] ▲ Collapse
| | | |
That's what I have been doing for the last 20 years. As I said before (other quick polls around this topic) I have an arrangement with a trusted colleague (we worked in-house together for 20 years) where we proofread each other's work. Quality-wise, it's the BEST decision I've ever made...
| | | |
neilmac wrote: My clients send me their stuff and all they're worried about is getting it back suitably good-to-go. It could be checked and remedied by Sooty and his magic wand for all they know...
Lol
| | | | Michael Harris
Německo
Local time: 20:45
Člen (2006)
němčina -> angličtina
Actually, this has been requested by 2 of my customers recently, but it is a rare case.
I do actually prefer them to deal with that sort of stuff.
| | |
|
|
|
EvaVer (X)
Local time: 20:45
čeština -> francouzština
+ ...
Some clients have their own proofreaders, but many don't - even agencies, and of course direct clients. When quality is important (no, not always - many translations are done just "to see what this is about"), they may ask me to find a proofreader and mostly are prepared to pay extra. Even agencies that normally do have their own - these may be unavailable at a given time, it happened to me.
| | | | | Highly unlikely | Nov 17, 2016 |
If they have reasons to want my output checked by a second pair of eyes, they'll make sure to hire these eyes directly, to make sure it's really another individual.
In my web page on hiring translation agencies vs. freelance translators, among my tips for choosing a translation agency:
... check if they demand that translators deliver fully-proofread material, while asserting that all their work is reviewed by someone else. If they do, you may be paying extra for services you won't get.
If some agencies DO that, I'm certain they KNOW it.
I've seen agencies boldly advertising on the home page of their web site something to the tune of...
Every translation we deliver will have been thoroughly checked and edited by a native speaker of the destination language country who is and has been living there for several years.
Then their translator recruitment page says...
You MUST always deliver perfect, finely proofread work. You are hereby notified that any complaints from our clients on your workmanship will be grounds for us to unappealably deduct XXX from your payment.
It's based on the ancient "You get what you INSPECT, not what you EXPECT" principle.
| | | |
Most of my clients are agencies, and they arrange for 'proofreading' themselves.
Some of them pay me to do it on other people's work, though I am cutting down on it.
We evade the issue and call it 'Korrektur' in Danish - I am sure my Danish colleagues have a definition, but I get instructions every time about precisely what the client is expecting me to do.
The few clients who are not agencies are usually private individuals who think my rates are steep enough al... See more Most of my clients are agencies, and they arrange for 'proofreading' themselves.
Some of them pay me to do it on other people's work, though I am cutting down on it.
We evade the issue and call it 'Korrektur' in Danish - I am sure my Danish colleagues have a definition, but I get instructions every time about precisely what the client is expecting me to do.
The few clients who are not agencies are usually private individuals who think my rates are steep enough already, or simply do not have the money to pay extra. If their jobs are simple certificates, it is not necessary.
In many cases it would take extra time, which we don't always have. I check as I go along, and do my utmost to get things right at the first attempt. This is where limited time is spent best, and there is less for a proofreader/reviewer to do anyway. ▲ Collapse
| | | | Muriel Vasconcellos
Spojené státy americké
Local time: 11:45
Člen (2003)
španělština -> angličtina
+ ...
I mostly work for international organizations that have fixed rates. They may or may not choose to use their own reviewers.
| | |
|
|
|
Gudrun Maydorn (X)
Německo
Local time: 20:45
angličtina -> němčina
+ ...
| Highly likely for direct customers | Nov 17, 2016 |
Whenever I do translations that are intended for publication or are legally significant, one of my trusted colleagues does the proofreading. I pay my proofreader and my customers pay me for translation + proofreading.
Mind you, I mostly work for direct customers, so I cannot tell what agencies would do.
| | | | matt robinson
Španělsko
Local time: 20:45
Člen (2010)
španělština -> angličtina
| Let's get busy | Nov 17, 2016 |
In contrast to neilmac, I feel an independent sweep of all work is useful. If there are serious errors, someone might sue.
| | | | Sheila Wilson
Španělsko
Local time: 19:45
Člen (2007)
angličtina
+ ...
| We'll try to be gentle on you, Julian ;) | Nov 17, 2016 |
I answered 50/50 on the basis that:
- agency clients wouldn't want to
- some direct clients already do
- other direct clients have decided not to.
I always offer direct clients the option of translation only (which of course includes careful checks by me!), or including proofreading by a "second pair of eyes". A few have gone for both although with English being such a "can do" language, they mostly prefer to find someone else, i.e. someone cheaper. Unfortunately, ... See more I answered 50/50 on the basis that:
- agency clients wouldn't want to
- some direct clients already do
- other direct clients have decided not to.
I always offer direct clients the option of translation only (which of course includes careful checks by me!), or including proofreading by a "second pair of eyes". A few have gone for both although with English being such a "can do" language, they mostly prefer to find someone else, i.e. someone cheaper. Unfortunately, that person is rarely both a native speaker and a professional proofreader so it can end in tears. I do everything to make sure they aren't my tears . I'll respond to a few queries but if it's clear that they're risking a perfectly good translation then I'll make it clear that it's at their own risk - and cost. I've had problems even with non-professional native English speakers. They don't often mess things up totally but older people (like me, but ones that haven't kept up with developments) often want me to write too (IMO) formally, and to add all those annoying little superscripts to dates, etc. ▲ Collapse
| | | | | Stran v tématu: [1 2] > | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » Poll: Do you think your customers would pay you extra if you outsourced proofreading of your translations? | Anycount & Translation Office 3000 | Translation Office 3000
Translation Office 3000 is an advanced accounting tool for freelance translators and small agencies. TO3000 easily and seamlessly integrates with the business life of professional freelance translators.
More info » |
| | Trados Business Manager Lite | Create customer quotes and invoices from within Trados Studio
Trados Business Manager Lite helps to simplify and speed up some of the daily tasks, such as invoicing and reporting, associated with running your freelance translation business.
More info » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |
Login to reply/comment 
